​​​
Publications
​
​
​Book Manuscript:

Daniel Navon. Mobilizing Mutations: New kinds of people in genetics 
and patient advocacy. ​Under contract with University of Chicago Press.

​
Peer-reviewed papers:

Daniel Navon (forthcoming). '"The gene didn't get the memo": New approaches
to illness and difference in postgenomic medicine'. Critical Inquiry. 

Daniel Navon (2017). ‘Truth in Advertising: Rationalizing ads and
knowing consumers ​in the early twentieth century United States’. 
Theory & Society, 46(2): 143-176.

Daniel Navon & Gil Eyal (2016). ‘Looping genomes: Diagnostic change and
the genetic makeup of the autism population’. 
American Journal of Sociology, 121(5): 1416-1471.

Daniel Navon (2015). ‘”We are a people, one people”: How 1967 transformed
Holocaust memory and Jewish identity in Israel and the US’. 
Journal of Historical Sociology, 28(3): 342-373.

Daniel Navon & Gil Eyal (2014). ‘The trading zone of autism genetics:
Examining the intersection of genomic and psychiatric classification'. 
BioSocieties, 9(3): 329-352. 

Daniel Navon & Uri Shwed (2012). ‘The chromosome 22q11.2 deletion:
From the unification of biomedical fields to ​a new kind of genetic condition’. 
Social Science & Medicine, 75(9): 1633-1641.

Daniel Navon (2012). ‘Genetic counseling, activism and the ‘genotype-first’
diagnosis of developmental disorders’. 
Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(6): 770-776. 

Daniel Navon (2011). ‘Genomic Designation: How genetics can delineate new,
phenotypically diffuse medical categories’. 
Social Studies of Science, 41(2): 203-226. 
​​

Other publications:

Daniel Navon (2016). Review of Brian Balmer’s ‘Secrecy and Science:
A Historical Sociology of Biological and Chemical Warfare’.
Contemporary Sociology, 45(3): 282-284.

w/ Gil Eyal et al. (2014). ‘New modes of understanding and acting on human difference
in autism research, advocacy and care: Introduction to a Special Issue of BioSocieties’.
BioSocieties, 9(3), 233-240.

Daniel Navon. Review of Jennifer S. Singh's 'Multiple Autisms: Spectrums of advocacy
​and genomic science'. Contemporary Sociology, 46(4): 479-481.